Review of Samir Okasha and Ken Binmore ’ s Evolution and rationality : decisions , co - operation , and strategic behaviour . Cambridge : Cambridge University
نویسنده
چکیده
There is a long history of sharing models between evolutionary biology and economics. Most famous is of course the introduction of game theory from economics into biology, which was then transformed into evolutionary game theory and re-imported into economics (Grüne-Yanoff 2011). Another area where both biology and economics have things to say is on cooperation. Both evolutionary biology and rational choice theory (RCT, hereafter) have problems accounting for cooperation within their standard frameworks. This has led to the development of a literature on cooperation that straddles the borders between economics and biology, and also philosophy. These topics were explored in two conferences organized by Samir Okasha and Ken Binmore at the University of Bristol, and eleven papers from these conferences are collected in this volume. In the introduction, Okasha and Binmore emphasize the strong connections between evolutionary theory and RCT. Continuing a theme from Okasha's recent work (Okasha 2007; and 2011), they focus particularly on how both RCT and evolutionary theory conceptualize behaviour 'as if' it is maximizing some quantity: utility in the case of RCT and fitness in the case of evolutionary theory. They suggest that the main question arising from this is, " when is it possible to identify the economist's notion of utility with the biologist's notion of fitness? " (p. 2). While this specific question might be of interest to some, it makes the book much more worthwhile that not all the chapters explicitly address it. Rather, the authors discuss a range of conceptual and methodological issues regarding the many interrelations between evolutionary theory and RCT, construed in their broadest senses. The most prominent interrelation is the use of game theory in both economics and biology to model strategic interaction. In addition, about half of the contributions address issues of cooperation in one way or another. Different explanations of cooperation, such as strong
منابع مشابه
Treatment of Displaced Sacroiliac Fracture Using the Lateral Window for Short Plate Buttress Reduction and Percutaneous Sacroiliac Screw Fixation.
Fractures through the sacroiliac joint are very challenging to treat, technically difficult to reduce through closed methods on account of the multiaxial displacement of fractures fragments, frequently occur in very unwell patients, and have poor outcomes if malreduction is present. We describe a technique utilising the lateral window and a short buttress plate to reduce and stabilize th...
متن کاملStrategic initial placement promotes evolution of cooperation on graphs
1Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 2Center of Mathematical Sciences and Applications, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 3Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 4Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 5Department of Mathematics, Harvard Universi...
متن کاملRationality in Multi-Agent Systems
This report is the result of a panel discussion at the Second UK Workshop on Foundations of MultiAgent Systems (FOMAS-97). All members of the panel are authors, listed alphabetically.
متن کاملThe effectiveness of communication skills training on medical students’ self-efficiency and social well-being based on the Calgary- Cambridge model
Background and aim: communication is a clinical skill in the field of medical education that it have key role in understanding of the patient and providing appropriate treatment. The main components of any effective interviews including: medical knowledge, communication skills, physical examination and problem solving ability. Communication skills cause patient satisfaction and the patient...
متن کاملExpanded HTA: Enhancing Fairness and Legitimacy
All societies face the need to make judgments about what interventions (both public health and personal medical) to provide to their populations under reasonable resource constraints. Their decisions should be informed by good evidence and arguments from health technology assessment (HTA). But if HTA restricts itself to evaluations of safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness, it risks being vie...
متن کامل